SAMMY UI is optimized for resolutions with a width 1024px and higher.
Cloud Controls Matrix
Browse Cloud Controls...
IAM-09: Segregation of Privileged Access Roles
Segregation of Privileged Access Roles
IAM-09: Are processes, procedures, and technical measures for the segregation of privileged access roles defined, implemented, and evaluated such that administrative data access, encryption, key management capabilities, and logging capabilities are distinct and separate?
Processes and procedures should be communicated within the organization for adherence and enforcement and regularly reviewed (at least annually).

Separation of duties should be established and implemented between development/test and production environments. With this control, a developer may use an administrator-level account with elevated privileges in the development environment and a separate account with user-level access to the production environment. In addition, appropriate levels of logs should be gathered from the production systems for further monitoring and analysis via security operations.

These operations should be managed using split knowledge and dual control where key management operations are used.
Control implemented
Not applicable - A “N/A” answer indicates that the portion of the control in question is out of scope of the assessment. The “SSRM control ownership” column is to be left blank (e.g., greyed out), and optionally the CSP may explain why it is the case (“CSP Implementation Description”).
No - A “No” answer indicates that the portion of the control in question is not implemented, while in scope of the assessment. The CSP has to assign the implementation responsibility of the control to the relevant party under column “SSRM control ownership”, and optionally elaborate on the “why” (has not been implemented), and “what” has to be done for its implementation by that party.
Yes - A “Yes” answer indicates that the portion of the control in question is implemented. The CSP indicates the responsible and accountable parties (SSRM control ownership), and optionally elaborates on the implementation “how-to” per relevant party CSP and/or CSC.
Control ownership
CSP-owned - The CSP is entirely responsible and accountable for the CCM control implementation.
CSC-owned - The Cloud Service Customer (CSC) is entirely responsible and accountable for the CCM control implementation.
Third-party - The third-party CSP in the supply chain (e.g., an IaaS provider) is responsible for CCM control implementation, while the CSP is fully accountable.
Shared CSP and CSC - Both the CSP and CSC share CCM control implementation responsibility and accountability.
Shared CSP and third party - Any CCM control implementation responsibility is shared between CSP and the third party, but the CSP remains fully accountable.
Description

Define, implement and evaluate processes, procedures and technical measures for the segregation of privileged access roles such that administrative access to data, encryption and key management capabilities and logging capabilities are distinct and separated.