Cloud Security Maturity Model 2.0
Browse Cloud Security...
IR-05.2: Dev/cloud teams engaged in incident response for their deployments using ChatOps or other workflow automation
IR-05.2: Many detections are triggered by members of distributed cloud and development teams performing legitimate actions or by simply making mistakes. An advanced IR technique uses real-time communications like ChatOps to ask them to validate that they took an action, and that the action was legitimate and expected. If they indicate they did not take the action, it likely means an attacker has compromised credentials or otherwise gained access and an incident can be automatically escalated.
  • Control automation: Either
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: Pass if the CSPM/CNAPP/CDR tool performing the assessment includes this capability and it is in active use
Not Applicable - Not applicable
Level 1: Initial - Initial. Manually managing policies/procedures, mostly through console. Architectures tend to resemble traditional infrastructure (e.g., low use of serverless and high reliance on network security controls). IAM mostly ad hoc with little-to-no federation.
Level 2: Repeatable - Repeatable. Policy-/checklist-based and relies more on manual or simple tooling. High variability between projects; not coordinated across deployments. Initial use of infrastructure as code (Terraform/CloudFormation), but security not consistently engaged in design/review. Federation on some accounts, but limited use of MFA due to difficulties supporting teams (especially on the command line).
Level 3: Defined - Defined. Policies and central coordination in place. Some initial security automation still executed manually. Some third-party tooling (orchestration with other tools), Federation on most accounts with widespread MFA, but still gaps on consistency. Security starting to review and promote use of CloudFormation/Terraform. CSPM/CNAPP (CSP or third party) in use.
Level 4: Capable - Capable. Strong centralized security management with consistent enforcement. Automation and guardrails across multiple deployments. Expanding library. Big shift from manual management and execution to running security operations with centralized platforms with centralized management and reporting. Consistent use of federation and MFA, with some gaps supporting toolchains.
Level 5: Efficient - Efficient. All major activities centrally managed, covering all of the CSMM domains. Integrated into infrastructure-as-code (IaC) environment. Built into the stack with provisioning automation. Federation and MFA working consistently across toolchains (e.g., command-line support).

Description
  • Control automation: Either
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: Pass if the CSPM/CNAPP/CDR tool performing the assessment includes this capability and it is in active use