Cloud Security Maturity Model 2.0
Browse Cloud Security...
CA-03.1: Cloud providers and services are approved for regulated data, and this list is available within the organization
CA-03.1: Cloud providers and services are assessed and validated as being approved for use with different regulated data types. This is on a central list and includes the specific regulations and any qualifying requirements to use the service. For example, a cloud provider's object storage might be approved for personal health information but only if encrypted using a customer-managed key. This list must specify a regulation (or contractual/internal compliance standard) and not generic data types like PII. This level of specificity is needed to properly perform and support audits. This requirement can be partially automated if the cloud provider publishes the compliance status of their services in a machine-readable format but will still require human review, approval and compilation into a list that can be distributed to development teams.
  • Control automation: Manual
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: none
Not Applicable - Not applicable
Level 1: Initial - Initial. Manually managing policies/procedures, mostly through console. Architectures tend to resemble traditional infrastructure (e.g., low use of serverless and high reliance on network security controls). IAM mostly ad hoc with little-to-no federation.
Level 2: Repeatable - Repeatable. Policy-/checklist-based and relies more on manual or simple tooling. High variability between projects; not coordinated across deployments. Initial use of infrastructure as code (Terraform/CloudFormation), but security not consistently engaged in design/review. Federation on some accounts, but limited use of MFA due to difficulties supporting teams (especially on the command line).
Level 3: Defined - Defined. Policies and central coordination in place. Some initial security automation still executed manually. Some third-party tooling (orchestration with other tools), Federation on most accounts with widespread MFA, but still gaps on consistency. Security starting to review and promote use of CloudFormation/Terraform. CSPM/CNAPP (CSP or third party) in use.
Level 4: Capable - Capable. Strong centralized security management with consistent enforcement. Automation and guardrails across multiple deployments. Expanding library. Big shift from manual management and execution to running security operations with centralized platforms with centralized management and reporting. Consistent use of federation and MFA, with some gaps supporting toolchains.
Level 5: Efficient - Efficient. All major activities centrally managed, covering all of the CSMM domains. Integrated into infrastructure-as-code (IaC) environment. Built into the stack with provisioning automation. Federation and MFA working consistently across toolchains (e.g., command-line support).

Description
  • Control automation: Manual
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: none