Cloud Security Maturity Model 2.0
Browse Cloud Security...
RSK-04.2: Security performs risk assessments on all production deployments annually or after major updates; assessments use cloud-native threat/risk models
RSK-04.2: Security performs documented risk assessments of all production cloud deployments. This is a consistent process, with proactive engagement with development/cloud teams. Assessments should be performed annually or on major updates to the deployment/applications architecture. The assessments use risk and threat models that are designed for cloud and include cloud-native risks, such as credential exposure and management plane abuse. While automated tooling can feed into a risk assessment, this requirement cannot typically be met with tools alone, because those can't automatically understand business risks.
  • Control automation: Either
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: This control can be automatable if the tool includes process automation for integrating business risk assessments with the identified technical risks
Not Applicable - Not applicable
Level 1: Initial - Initial. Manually managing policies/procedures, mostly through console. Architectures tend to resemble traditional infrastructure (e.g., low use of serverless and high reliance on network security controls). IAM mostly ad hoc with little-to-no federation.
Level 2: Repeatable - Repeatable. Policy-/checklist-based and relies more on manual or simple tooling. High variability between projects; not coordinated across deployments. Initial use of infrastructure as code (Terraform/CloudFormation), but security not consistently engaged in design/review. Federation on some accounts, but limited use of MFA due to difficulties supporting teams (especially on the command line).
Level 3: Defined - Defined. Policies and central coordination in place. Some initial security automation still executed manually. Some third-party tooling (orchestration with other tools), Federation on most accounts with widespread MFA, but still gaps on consistency. Security starting to review and promote use of CloudFormation/Terraform. CSPM/CNAPP (CSP or third party) in use.
Level 4: Capable - Capable. Strong centralized security management with consistent enforcement. Automation and guardrails across multiple deployments. Expanding library. Big shift from manual management and execution to running security operations with centralized platforms with centralized management and reporting. Consistent use of federation and MFA, with some gaps supporting toolchains.
Level 5: Efficient - Efficient. All major activities centrally managed, covering all of the CSMM domains. Integrated into infrastructure-as-code (IaC) environment. Built into the stack with provisioning automation. Federation and MFA working consistently across toolchains (e.g., command-line support).

Description
  • Control automation: Either
  • AWS control specification: none
  • Azure control specification: none
  • GCP control specification: none
  • Third-party (CSPM/CNAPP) control specification: This control can be automatable if the tool includes process automation for integrating business risk assessments with the identified technical risks